Per-user model charges for everyone, even inactive – costs skyrocket with hires. As training manager in a mid-size firm, this unpredictability sucks.
What pricing issues have ya faced, and how did ya find a model that fits better? Like flat rates or active-user only?
Mid-size growth means costs need to be controllable – share your thoughts.
Issues were hidden fees and per-user caps. Found flat pricing unlimited – no extra for growth or features. Fit our mid-size needs perfect.
We budgeted once a year, no quarterly adjustments.
Predictability is key for mids – flat wins there.
Caps in per-user forced us to clean inactive often – annoying admin work.
Active-user good for variable logins in mid-size.
Flat encourages wider use since no per-user penalty.
Flat encourages wider use since no per-user penalty.
@Milo_V, any caps on features in flat rate?
Worried flat means basic only.
Active-user helped, but flat rate was best for predictability. No surprises as we grew.
With flat, we could add users freely without budget worries.
Yeah, and add-ons pile up. What model ya on now?
Add-ons for basics like reports felt like nickel-diming.
Per-user is rough for fluctuatin’ teams. Switched to active-user to pay only for who logs in.
We had lots of seasonal staff, so this cut waste big time.